Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Proposal: Never Met a Dynasty I Didn’t Like

Reaches quorum of FOR votes [12 - 1]
Enacted by Elias IX

Adminned at 11 Feb 2009 10:09:31 UTC

Repeal Rule 1.8.1 (Metadynasties).

[ Not sure why this is in the core ruleset, as it’s entirely redundant. If you want to start a Metadynasty, you just have to propose “Bang, dynasty ends, repeal all dynastic rules, Arthexis is no longer the Writer. We shall call this a Metadynasty.” and Rules 1.4 and 1.5 automatically take care of DEFERENTIALs without a Writer, and the fact that nobody can cast a VETO. This rule is just a vague heads up that one day there might be a proposal, or a CfJ, or something else, that causes this to happen. ]

posted by Kevan at 11 Feb 2009 00:27:00 UTC Comments (13)

Comments

Amnistar: he/himIdle

11-02-2009 00:31:47 UTC

for

Wakukee: Idle

11-02-2009 00:42:59 UTC

for  EDITING CHIP is well deserved.

Qwazukee: Idle

11-02-2009 00:52:52 UTC

against I like the Metadynasty rule, it really helped me understand what was going on when I joined Blognomic (in the middle of a Metadynasty).

If nothing else, please leave some mention in the ruleset and then clarify in the glossary.

Kevan: Concierge he/him

11-02-2009 00:56:19 UTC

A glossary entry would make sense. We don’t need a hefty core rule preparing new players for something that happens once every two years, though.

Sparrow: Idle

11-02-2009 01:01:07 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

11-02-2009 01:38:14 UTC

imperial

Hix: Idle

11-02-2009 01:52:20 UTC

for Never noticed that.  I certainly would have been against the inclusion of this rule.

Klisz: Idle

11-02-2009 15:24:35 UTC

for

Rodlen: Idle

11-02-2009 15:35:04 UTC

for

SingularByte: he/him

11-02-2009 16:19:17 UTC

for

Wooden Squid: Idle

11-02-2009 17:41:34 UTC

for

ais523:

11-02-2009 17:45:38 UTC

for Move it to the FAQ, if you like.

Elias IX: Idle

11-02-2009 18:07:26 UTC

for Quorum vote!