Wednesday, December 05, 2012

Proposal: No indefinite time ranges.

Reached quorum 6 votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 06 Dec 2012 07:25:52 UTC

In the rule Identity Theft Replace

If the Mastermind agrees that Identity Theft has taken place then he should indicate agreement with a FOR vote on the post

with

If the Mastermind agrees that Identity Theft has taken place then he should indicate agreement with a FOR vote on the post within 24 hours of the post being made

Josh is waiting until I add something to my garage to fill it up with rubble. This seems like an abuse of the intent of the identity theft mechanics. 24 hours is plenty of time, and if it fails out you can always remake the request. (So technically there is a 4 day window for Josh to respond from the moment you do the identity theft).

Also kevan I’m going to buy another gym before next week begins

posted by Clucky at 05 Dec 2012 01:17:50 UTC Comments (5)

Comments

Kevan: he/him

05-12-2012 08:45:21 UTC

for This does make me wonder if we’d benefit from each Emperor informally identifying themselves as a certain “type”, just so we know what to expect from the dynasty. (A Benevolent who will always perform all “shoulds” required of them, a Combatative who will take measures to stop people getting ahead if given them, etc.) It’s often there in the theme, but it can be wrong-footing when it’s left unstated.

Josh: Observer he/they

05-12-2012 08:59:11 UTC

for I think it was a response to Clucky stealing my identity at all - I wanted to see how far the rule could be abused. “The Emperor is not a player” is quite a good signifier for Benevolent vs Malign though, Kevan.

Murphy:

05-12-2012 16:58:36 UTC

for

quirck: he/him

05-12-2012 18:57:01 UTC

imperial

Larrytheturtle:

06-12-2012 01:37:52 UTC

for