Saturday, January 24, 2015

Proposal: Non-Hollow Failure

Reached quorum 6 votes to 2. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 25 Jan 2015 19:36:46 UTC

In the rule “Missions” amend the text

* If the Mission is Attended, and if an Android is among its Responder Team and has prepared to Sabotage the Mission, the Mission fails as if it were Unattended.

to read

* If the Mission is Attended, and if an Android is among its Responder Team and has prepared to Sabotage the Mission, the Severity of its System is incremented twice.

Currently, Mission Sabotage is no worse than simple neglect, meaning that all Missions should be automatically approved, since the possibility of no damage/one-damage is strictly better than certain one-damage.
With this amendment, the choice is made an actual choice.

posted by Skju at 24 Jan 2015 02:34:00 UTC Comments (9)

Comments

Bucky:

24-01-2015 03:20:39 UTC

imperial

Sylphrena:

24-01-2015 07:24:49 UTC

imperial

Josh: Observer he/they

24-01-2015 08:33:00 UTC

against Agree with the principle, not the application.

Kevan: he/him

24-01-2015 09:14:14 UTC

for for other reasons - I don’t think it needs to be a decision, but I think Androids probably need a greater reward for sticking their neck out and giving away quite a lot about who they might be.

Brendan: he/him

24-01-2015 16:16:17 UTC

for

_Fox_:

24-01-2015 20:25:33 UTC

for

ayesdeeef:

25-01-2015 03:36:46 UTC

against How do Androids work? I’ve never played a round with them before.

Kevan: he/him

25-01-2015 12:10:52 UTC

Nobody has. All we know about them is what’s in the ruleset right now: from tomorrow, two players will secretly be Androids, with the ability to anonymously “sabotage” proposals and missions.

Kevan: he/him

25-01-2015 12:12:09 UTC

And that Human players can vote to disable suspected Androids, so it’s probably bad to be caught being one.