Wednesday, March 17, 2021

Call for Judgment: Pocket points

Becomes popular, 6-0. Enacted by pokes.

Adminned at 17 Mar 2021 22:59:30 UTC

The first game of Giolitti between myself and Jumble has ended, but a peg can’t be awarded because it is contingent on whether we scored our winnows at the opportunities when we ‘may’ have. If we treat occasions where we obviously did so as scoring winnows, by my count the game ended with my 17 points to Jumble’s 6. Consider the final score of the game to be as such, end the game, and award me a peg.

Comments

Bucky:

17-03-2021 19:54:17 UTC

I think it’d be more convenient to track score in the table’s comments.

Kevan: he/him

17-03-2021 20:10:29 UTC

Winnowing the Winnow will remove the requirement for Score to be publicly tracked. I agree with Bucky that it would be easier to track score in comments (“I play the Queen of Swords and score 1 for l’Aria, taking me to 4.”) than to make it a legal (albeit platonically ignorable) requirement to say nothing but keep a wiki table up to date. Certainly easier to check an opponent’s score if they’ve been announcing it as they go.

pokes:

17-03-2021 20:13:58 UTC

Tracking score in comments is a whole other can of worms. If “I play the Queen of Swords and score 1 for l’Aria, taking me to 4.” but doing so actually took me to 5, how much of the comment is invalid?

Kevan: he/him

17-03-2021 20:18:10 UTC

Under Winnowing the Winnow, that comment would be valid. Your score would secretly be 5, but the move would stand - the only broken rule would be me giving your opponent a peg at the end of the game if I believed you’d only scored 4.

pokes:

17-03-2021 20:30:30 UTC

Alright, I edited this to be no ruleset fix considering Winnowing the Winnow will fix it, and just a straightforward gamestate fix.

Kevan: he/him

17-03-2021 21:30:36 UTC

for

Clucky: he/him

17-03-2021 21:32:21 UTC

for

Josh: he/they

17-03-2021 21:38:38 UTC

for

Brendan: he/him

17-03-2021 21:57:46 UTC

for

Bucky:

17-03-2021 22:30:39 UTC

for