Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Call for Judgment: Recognizing Achievements

Unpopular, 0-6. Failed by JonathanDark.

Adminned at 15 Nov 2023 16:06:38 UTC

Treat the Achievements of the Wizards named lendunistus and Vovix as if they were legally awarded.


Clucky: he/him

14-11-2023 16:55:49 UTC

Can we just word this in a way that its not dependent on TV highlights to pass?


14-11-2023 17:22:25 UTC

This doesn’t solve the problems if Off Camera fails.

lendunistus: he/him

14-11-2023 17:33:58 UTC

should be “the Wizards named lendunistus and Vovix”

JonathanDark: he/him

14-11-2023 18:15:05 UTC

@Bucky: Off Camera doesn’t actually solve any problems either. It simply takes away lendunistus’ and Vovix’s achievements. This CfJ is the counter-argument against Off Camera.

For the actual solution, “TV Highlights” seems good enough.

@Clucky: I removed the dependency on “TV Highlights”. This CfJ now just treats those achievements as legal regardless of where the ruleset ends up.

Clucky: he/him

14-11-2023 18:36:02 UTC

okay now this is super dangerous because Lendun and vovix could just award themselves achievements for free. So might need another stab at this.

Clucky: he/him

14-11-2023 18:40:07 UTC


JonathanDark: he/him

14-11-2023 19:13:59 UTC

Good point, I should have mentioned the specific Achievements.


Zack: he/him

14-11-2023 20:43:59 UTC



14-11-2023 23:02:29 UTC


Snisbo: she/they

15-11-2023 01:11:53 UTC

against In favor of the spirit, not the potential pitfalls in execution

Kevan: he/him

15-11-2023 08:48:44 UTC