Thursday, February 12, 2009

Proposal: The General Demands Loyalty v2

Private Sparrow is to be Commended for his attempts at encouraging loyalty, I have taken matters into my own hands, however, and thus this proposal no longer serves any use.

That is all.

General Amnistar

Adminned at 13 Feb 2009 10:23:02 UTC

Re-proposed on General Amnistar’s orders.

Create a new Rule “Loyalty” with the text:

Each Soldier has a statistic “Loyalty” that is tracked in the GNDT which is a whole integer.  The default level for Loyalty is 0.

Create a new sub-rule of Loyalty “Suppport the General” with the text:

When a proposal is enacted or failed, the Soldier that was the author of the proposal may change their loyalty based on how the General voted on that proposal.  If the Proposal passed and the General voted FOR it, or if it failed and the general voted AGAINST it the Soldier may increase their Loyalty once by 1.  If the Proposal passed and the General voted AGAINST it, or if it failed and the General voted FOR it the Soldier may decrease their Loyalty once by 1.

If the Soldier does not increase or decrease their loyalty within 48 hours of the Proposal the General has voted for or against passing or failing, another Soldier may, as long as no other Soldier has, decrease the Loyalty of the Soldier by 2.

Comments

Amnistar: he/himIdle

12-02-2009 01:42:38 UTC

for

Klisz: Idle

12-02-2009 01:44:09 UTC

imperial

Rodlen: Idle

12-02-2009 01:50:35 UTC

imperial

Hix: Idle

12-02-2009 01:54:46 UTC

imperial (Enactment of this Proposal does not affect Sparrow’s loyalty)

Qwazukee: Idle

12-02-2009 02:22:24 UTC

imperial But couldn’t someone write a terrible proposal, have Amnistar vote against it, and increase eir loyalty?

Clucky: he/him

12-02-2009 02:24:07 UTC

against oh noez I am not loyal!

Amnistar: he/himIdle

12-02-2009 02:57:42 UTC

hence why Veto’s aren’t listed :).

Qwazukee: Idle

12-02-2009 02:59:37 UTC

Well, if you feel real confident about it, you’re the one in charge.

for

Elias IX: Idle

12-02-2009 04:01:25 UTC

:BOOOM:

Darknight: he/him

12-02-2009 04:10:24 UTC

for

arthexis: he/himIdle

12-02-2009 04:58:22 UTC

against

Devenger: Idle

12-02-2009 08:09:23 UTC

for best nade image ever, I’m sold

SingularByte: he/him

12-02-2009 11:01:44 UTC

against

Kevan: Concierge he/him

12-02-2009 11:16:26 UTC

against Fiddly paperwork, with a punishment for not keeping it up to date? No thanks.

Hix: Idle

12-02-2009 17:13:25 UTC

against CoV

Wooden Squid: Idle

12-02-2009 17:57:39 UTC

against yeah bleh

TrumanCapote: Idle

12-02-2009 18:05:19 UTC

against

Amnistar: he/himIdle

12-02-2009 19:17:04 UTC

For those voting against because it requires paperwork, it shouldn’t be difficult to keep track of.  You only need to worry about it if/when you make a proposal, limiting it to at most 2 actions a day, and not even that many if you aren’t an active proposer.

The penalty for failure (which is the same time limit maximum on proposals) is there so that if someone ‘forgets’ to decrease their loyalty, it still happens.

Amnistar: he/himIdle

12-02-2009 19:23:15 UTC

Also, just to note, I have no intention making loyalty an always good/always bad thing.  I intend for either side (or remaining neutral) to have benefits.

Amnistar: he/himIdle

13-02-2009 18:22:14 UTC

against BOOOOOOOM