Thursday, August 06, 2020

Proposal: Think Positive

Fewer than a quorum not voting against. Failed 1 FOR to 5 AGAINST with 1 DEF, by Kevan.

Adminned at 07 Aug 2020 14:23:20 UTC

You can never go below 0 from this point when with the points on the Gambler’s table. Additionally, if you were below 0 before this proposal, then it would be changed to 0. And to prevent any clashes, if you were to lose more points than you have that would have resulted in being in the negatives would instead make your score 0.

So like if you have 2 points and you were to lose 5, then your score would change to 0 instead of -3.

posted by Raven1207 at 06 Aug 2020 14:08:00 UTC Comments (9)

Comments

Raven1207: he/they

06-08-2020 14:16:30 UTC

🤷‍♂️ Thought this could be helpful

Kevan: he/him

06-08-2020 14:56:33 UTC

Are you proposing that these two paragraphs be added verbatim to the ruleset, as a new rule with no name? See the FAQ if you’re wondering how to get boxes around text, like in other people’s proposals.

Raven1207: he/they

06-08-2020 15:32:24 UTC

Basically making it where no one is stuck in negatives

Lulu: she/her

06-08-2020 23:54:16 UTC

against

Darknight: he/him

07-08-2020 02:22:32 UTC

imperial

Josh: Observer he/they

07-08-2020 07:17:56 UTC

against This proposal doesn’t do anything as it’s not making any changes to the ruleset.

Kevan: he/him

07-08-2020 07:30:39 UTC

I think it’s fine to charitably interpret a block of text as “add all this text to the ruleset verbatim”.

against as negative scores feel like a minor part of the game, and this creates some odd situations (if I steal 10 points from a player with 5 points, how many points do I actually get?).

derrick: he/him

07-08-2020 13:11:33 UTC

against

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus: he/they

07-08-2020 13:58:05 UTC

against