Sunday, September 22, 2013

Call for Judgment: This week started friday

Failed 0 votes to 7. Failed by Kevan.

Adminned at 24 Sep 2013 02:27:42 UTC

The illegal changes made by Kevan to the gamestate made on friday 09/20/2013 (Increasing of the energy of each apprentice as specified in Rule 2.6, in this CfJ from now on called “Recharging”) are to be seen as legitime and not be reverted.
Instead, this Recharging is seen as the weekly communal action of the week beginning with monday 09/23/2013.
Thus, in that week (09/23-09/29) the Recharging is not to be done.

Well, I don’t see the harm in bringing the recharging of next week to this friday, this time, instead of reverting the actions that happened till then (Also illegally casted spells etc) and increasing the energy tomorrow.
I am however not sure how everybody else feels about this, whether or not this is a topic for a CfJ and whether or not this is worded in a way that actually achieves that goal.
Also I’m unsure if this changes any gamestate, so could be failed by rule 1.6, but I guess making illegal changes valid counts as a change?

Comments

quirck: he/him

22-09-2013 20:59:35 UTC

Actually the rule “Recharging” changed on 19th, so the action that was taken on 20th by Kevan differs from the action that was taken on 16th. Do you mind some extra energy? against

Larrytheturtle:

23-09-2013 06:15:16 UTC

against Per quirck

Purplebeard:

23-09-2013 07:25:38 UTC

against Quirck has a point: instead of altering an existing Weekly Communal Action, a new one was created to replace it.

We usually avoid this problem by attaching a keyword to the action (“an Apprentice may Recharge by (...)”). With that wording, any changes to the action’s effects wouldn’t affect the history of the underlying Weekly Communal Action.

Kevan: he/him

23-09-2013 08:13:21 UTC

against Hadn’t intended it this way, but Quirck makes a good point.

Sphinx:

23-09-2013 10:08:49 UTC

Yeah, have to agree with Quirck :)
against

Spitemaster:

23-09-2013 12:18:21 UTC

against

Clucky: he/him

23-09-2013 22:59:36 UTC

haha yeah I actually didn’t realize thats why we did that PB against