Call for Judgment: Window of Opportunity
Quorum Reached. Passes 6-0—Clucky
Adminned at 31 Jul 2021 14:54:10 UTC
Uphold that the following vampire lords were unidle at the time it was posted and all other vampire lords were idle: ais523, Brendan, Chiiika, Clucky, Josh, Jumble, Kevan, lemonfanta, Raven1207.
Unidle any Vampire Lord who has made a post or comment requesting to be unidled after this CfJ was created. Idle any vampire lord who has made a post or comment requesting to be Idled after this CfJ was created.
In “Idle Vampire Lords” replace “the past four days” with “the past 96 hours (4 Days)” wherever it appears, replace “last seven days” with “past 168 Hours (7 days)” and “previous four days” with “past 96 hours (4 days)”
So the idle rule is currently busted. A day is defined to be “unless otherwise stated, refer to a day beginning at and including 00:00:00 UTC, ending when the next day begins”
This makes time periods like “within the previous four days” a bit clunky. It meant that ais’s request to unidle remained invalid until it became the 31st and thus the “previous 4 days” were suddenly the 30th, 29th, 28th and 27th whereas when he made the request it was the 29th, 28th, 27th, and 26th (which includes the day he tried to request to be idled)
It also arguably means that requests to unidle don’t instantly go through, but that is less clear if “past 4 days” means the 31st, 30th, 29th and 28th or 30th, 29th, 28th and 27th.
Regardless seems good to just rubber stamp the list, fix it to be worded in a way that everyone actually interpreted the rule, and move on.
Clucky: he/him
(we should also probably fix both the ‘bury comments in old posts for tactical purposes’ scam and also probably make it so that the idle timeout starts when you go idle so people don’t need to track down when the request was made. but those aren’t as pressing as realizing that tons of players may have been illegally idled/some of us may have been illegally unidled)