Sunday, November 29, 2009

Proposal: |X|

Self-killed -Darth

Adminned at 29 Nov 2009 20:25:07 UTC

VETO THIS PROPOSAL IT IS VETO BAIT

veto

The veto icon is awesome and Bucky hasn’t vetoed anything…

Comments

Klisz:

29-11-2009 22:58:33 UTC

veto  Explicit author veto.

Klisz:

29-11-2009 22:58:49 UTC

arrow

Qwazukee:

29-11-2009 23:17:15 UTC

for

Bucky:

30-11-2009 00:32:41 UTC

against

Klisz:

30-11-2009 00:33:55 UTC

@Qwaz: ?

redtara: they/them

30-11-2009 00:38:07 UTC

imperial

Qwazukee:

30-11-2009 02:04:54 UTC

It’s a Proposal, I can vote FOR.

Darknight: he/him

30-11-2009 02:18:51 UTC

against to spite u lol

Klisz:

30-11-2009 02:32:52 UTC

@Qwaz: ...you voted FOR a veto bait…

tecslicer:

30-11-2009 02:40:45 UTC

for I like the prop. I think it has flair and a cool name.

Klisz:

30-11-2009 02:57:09 UTC

@tecslicer: But it makes no sense… it will cause absolute chaos if it passes…

Darknight: he/him

30-11-2009 03:07:32 UTC

Well it doesn’t have an effect so =P to your chaos theory.

Klisz:

30-11-2009 03:11:03 UTC

It does have an effect. We just don’t know what that effect is.

Qwazukee:

30-11-2009 03:18:53 UTC

The effect is that this Proposal is retroactively vetoed.

tecslicer:

30-11-2009 03:27:03 UTC

It solidifies the truths that “The veto icon is awesome. . .” and that “...Bucky hasn’t vetoed anything” and then it vetoes itself. I think that any prop that can simultaneously establish truth and then repeal it, is worth the   for .

Klisz:

30-11-2009 03:54:36 UTC

@tecslicer: It does not solidify those truths, as they are in the Flavor Text box.

Excalabur:

30-11-2009 04:05:29 UTC

Stupid.

Bucky:

30-11-2009 04:11:01 UTC

I think the only thing this proposal does is make it so that it can’t become enacted once it’s enacted.  It doesn’t un-enact itself.

Klisz:

30-11-2009 04:17:34 UTC

Alright, since Bucky seems to hate vetoes that much…  against  s/k

Klisz:

30-11-2009 04:18:40 UTC

Although I wonder what “It is veto bait” would do.