Friday, July 27, 2018

Proposal: A Historian without an Opinion

Became popular 8 to 0. Enacted by Derrick

Adminned at 30 Jul 2018 12:56:46 UTC

Add a new rule under special cases named “Imperial Deferentials”, and set it active

If the Historian has voted DEFERENTIAL on a proposal, that vote is instead considered to be valid and either FOR (if more Wizards have voted FOR the proposal than have voted AGAINST it) or AGAINST (in all other cases).

I’ve been wishing for this rule. Its original form was “Doctor Deferentials”, written in the Plague dynasty, which was Kevan’s 20th dynasty, and the first one I played.

posted by derrick at 27 Jul 2018 16:03:00 UTC Comments (9)

Comments

Brendan: he/him

27-07-2018 16:35:57 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

27-07-2018 17:56:37 UTC

for

Lulu: she/her

27-07-2018 18:43:39 UTC

for

9spaceking:

27-07-2018 21:16:19 UTC

for

card:

28-07-2018 02:20:37 UTC

why not stick it in the special case rules?
for

Pseudo-Climacus:

28-07-2018 04:03:40 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

28-07-2018 07:32:11 UTC

[card] This is what it’s doing.

Madrid:

28-07-2018 10:12:52 UTC

I can’t vote lol but for

Corona:

28-07-2018 17:35:26 UTC

for