Timed out, 5 - 1 (with 2 unresolved DEF votes)
Enacted by Elias IX.
Adminned at 24 Dec 2008 14:27:54 UTC
In 2.3 Membership replace the sentence “A Citizen is considered to be idle within each Faction that e doesn’t belong to.” with “A Citizen is considered to be idle within each Faction that e doesn’t belong to, except for the purpose of enacting or failing proposals.”
I’d find it helpful to know the reason for the against and def votes. Is it an objection to admins being able enact proposals that don’t belong to their faction or is it because the rule is ambiguous?
Admins should be able to enact proposals for all the factions.
What happens if I say “An admin breaks two bones when e enacts this proposal” or “The admin who enacts this becomes the Watcher”
in the case of the first, nothing, in the case of the second…nothing.
Unless the admin is part of that dynasty.
Here’s one for you though arthexis, what happens if there are no admins in a specific faction?
I’m leaving my vote where it is, because it means faction proposals can be enacted out of order by admins, but since all faction proposals are proposals, there isn’t really nay need for it, because when it reached the end of the queue as a normal proposal it can be enacted.
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
arthexis: he/him