Friday, July 23, 2021

Proposal: Blood in the Cauldron

At 1-5, fewer than a quorum not voting against. Failed by Brendan.

Adminned at 25 Jul 2021 14:22:43 UTC

Add the following to the first paragraph of “Status”

Bloodthirsty Vampire Lords may perform the Distilling Mysterious Action despite the restriction on which Mysterious Actions Bloodthirsty Vampire Lord can perform, provided they have enough Puissance to pay the cost, but if doing so would set their Puissance to a value higher than 1, their Puissance instead set to 1



23-07-2021 15:57:20 UTC

What’s the idea behind this? It looks tactical, but I don’t understand what you’re trying to achieve.

Clucky: he/him

23-07-2021 16:11:16 UTC

The thing I’m trying to achieve here is to allow bloodthirsty vampire lords to distill, but balancing it by making distilling more expensive for them

Brendan: he/him

23-07-2021 16:12:08 UTC

It is hard to imagine a circumstance where this is a better deal than just Frenzying down to being non-Bloodthirsty and then paying 2 for a normal Distill.


23-07-2021 16:31:27 UTC

Perhaps this is an attempt at a scam in which Bloodthirsty Vampire Lords can Distil despite not being able to afford the Influence cost? If so, I don’t think it works, but you can sort-of read the rule as though the Influence cost is a restriction.

Also, “their Puissance instead set to 1” is missing a verb, and the second instance of “Bloodthirsty Vampire Lord” should be plural.

Finally, Distilling is not actually a Power Action, so the rule as written has no referent.

Brendan: he/him

23-07-2021 22:37:46 UTC



23-07-2021 23:22:23 UTC

against I don’t see any reason anyone would ever use this; it costs a minimum of 13 Puissance, as opposed to 9 for Blood Frenzy + Distil.

Josh: he/they

24-07-2021 07:03:54 UTC

No vote obvs

lemon: she/her

24-07-2021 07:09:16 UTC


Kevan: City he/him

24-07-2021 08:54:25 UTC

against Per Ais; at best inefficient, at worst a scam.

Raven1207: he/they

24-07-2021 21:48:44 UTC