Wednesday, November 28, 2018

Story Post: Case No. 2: Goldberg Technology v. Benjamin Chamberlain

In this Defamation case, the principals of Goldberg Technology assert that Benjamin’s false claims about their primary technology were meant to scuttle a deal, brokered by the deceased, providing the firm with access to capital.

posted by pokes at 28 Nov 2018 04:02:00 UTC Comments (5)

Comments

Kevan: he/him

28-11-2018 14:54:00 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

28-11-2018 16:14:53 UTC

Actually, neither of these Cases are valid: where something is required to be done “randomly” (but not “secretly randomly”), the Judge must roll dice in the GNDT for it. That didn’t happen for either of these. Although Guilt is secretly random, the other rolls are publicly random.

pokes:

28-11-2018 17:41:38 UTC

Doh! I’ll propose a fix

Purplebeard:

29-11-2018 08:02:31 UTC

for

pokes:

01-12-2018 03:54:19 UTC

This case is now closed; Benjamin mounted a successful defense by demonstrating that his claims were based in fact.