Checks out. Although I’m not sure it’s even necessary for you not to be a cultist?

Oh right, to destroy them, you need to be a non-cultist.

:Sphinx:

Can we get some details of how you think you achieved this? Anonymising the names of any donors is obviously fine.

I donated some Artefacts - out of my own reserve, not any Artefacts from anyone else that I may have been entrusted with; those are safe.

I give full endorsement from my behalf to anyone who has collaborated with me to share whatever information about our contact that they desire.

I don’t know if people would want to share it, but they’re cool with it, I will.

(That said, there was no scam, I just got Artefacts the old fashioned way. Enough people gave them to me.)

[pokes] How many? I just want to know what chain of events we’re voting on the legality of here, and whether it involves anything more nuanced than some Explorers giving 3 Artefacts to Cuddlebeam.

@Kevan. Not 3, so I can’t confirm the victory myself, hence a :Sphinx: vote.

I’ll just say that Cuddlebeam was a participant in the arresting mission.

I don’t see how there can be much doubt when Sphinx has greenticked it himself.

It’s unclear from the comments given whether Sphinx’s approval means “yes, Cuddlebeam was handed 3 Artefacts in a completely unremarkable manner” or something more like “Cuddlebeam has privately convinced me that Artefacts can be destroyed even if held by other players”.

I’d defer to the first, I’d like to hear more details and judge it for myself if it was the latter.

Yes, Cuddlebeam was in possession of at least three artefacts and destroyed all of them, no other artefacts were destroyed.

What’s the next dynasty?

[Sphinx] But Cuddlebeam is claiming to have destroyed four here. Would destroying three have been enough to meet “destroyed the most Artefacts” regardless?

Good one Cuddlebeam!

I think I know what happened

Yes, Cuddlebeam destroyed four artefacts and noone else destroyed any.

Alright then, that meets the victory condition.

well done!