This should include everyone’s Favorites too.

Make it an “if a quorum of Wordsmiths’ EVC contain Favorites” then add Favorites to the list.

Nah, I don’t like riders and my own opinion is that it should be up to each player to decide if they want to reveal their favourites.

but (with the DoV likely to enact before this does) it does have the same issue as the CfJ. I don’t know how much views vary on this, but it seems important to me that we can’t and shouldn’t encourage the Puzzler to ignore “This is the Ruleset for BlogNomic; all Wordsmiths shall obey it” during voting and take a reveal action that the rules say he may not take, on the grounds that a pending proposal is (very probably) going to absolve him of having broken that rule, a little later.

@Kevan This is a fuzzy area in the ruleset in general. On its face, post-Ascension, the ruleset can’t prevent the current Emperor from disclosing whatever they like, as the information they hold will cease to be gamestate. Even the specific prohibition that prevents me from disclosing private information from the Venetian dynasty has no actual effect. The ruleset simply doesn’t have a mechanism to prevent the eventual disclosure of information.

That makes any vote like this essentially symbolic. It’s an act of social permission, not really a mechanic.

pulling from the CfJ - I am unsure if this can be passed because of the dynastic ruleset modification clause that bar it from being able to be passed in Interregnum.

[Josh] Oh, sure, a vote on “JonathanDark is hereby given permission to reveal this information after the dynasty ends” would seem entirely fair and socially binding. And it’s probably safe to regard all FOR votes on this proposal to be also implying that, really.

I just don’t think “JonathanDark is hereby absolved of any illegal actions he performed between this proposal being posted and being enacted” works, in a game that requires us to obey the rules at all times.

I’ll just treat this as a social contract, then, and wait until after the dynastic reset.

I may wait for the initial flurry of new dynasty proposals as well. I don’t want to overly distract from the momentum of a new dynasty.

because the current Puzzler have no way to reveal this

More than that: the term “Puzzler” currently has no meaning, nevermind the rest of the terminology in this Proposal.

Hence why I’m going to treat this as a social contract and not as compulsion via rules.

CoV

wait,  to clear the queue

Chiiika then enacted the proposal, but it wasn’t yet 24 hours old. (We switched to a minimum of 24 hours before enacting proposals back in April, if you missed it.) I’ve reopened it.

This means that it now needs to run for 24 hours 40 minutes, as it was closed to voting for 40 minutes.