Monday, February 27, 2023

Proposal: CvL-4Pm3Zmw

Withdrawn. Failed by Brendan.

Adminned at 28 Feb 2023 12:30:02 UTC

Reword the sentence in the rule “Heat” that currently reads “Every Villager has a publicly tracked amount of Heat, representing their core temperature in Fahrenheit, a rational number which may be negative and which defaults to the average of all other Villagers’ Heat rounded down.” to read as follows:

Every Villager has a publicly tracked amount of Heat, representing their core temperature in Fahrenheit, a rational number which may be negative and which defaults to the average of all Conscious Villagers’ Heat rounded down (unless the dynasty is in Endgame Lockdown, in which case it defaults to 0).

Delete from the rule “Heat” the sentence that begins “When a Villager becomes Unidle, their Heat is…”

Reword the sentence in the rule “Goals” that reads “A Villager may add one or more Goals to their own Reject list at any time” to read:

A Villager with fewer than five Goals in their Reject list may add a Goal to their own Reject list at any time.

Spyders Georg is an outlier adn should not have been counted

Comments

Kevan: he/him

27-02-2023 18:35:59 UTC

If we’re heading inevitably for some kind of last player standing endgame, we probably don’t want new or unidling (or reinitialising!) players to be able to spawn into second place at the last minute.

Brendan: he/him

27-02-2023 20:15:40 UTC

Amended.

Habanero:

28-02-2023 07:31:57 UTC

for

SingularByte: he/him

28-02-2023 07:45:50 UTC

I’m not sure it’s a good idea to permit unidling players to skip the whole heat loss mechanic of the game. Half of all idle players who had been in this dynasty would be in first place (or joint first place) heat-wise if we delete that sentence.
against

Kevan: he/him

28-02-2023 09:07:53 UTC

Yes, doesn’t seem a great idea to remove the “When a Villager becomes Unidle, their Heat is set to the average of all other Villagers’ Heat rounded down, unless the last legally endowed value it held is lower in which case the Villager retains the lower value.” rule (which wasn’t part of this proposal when I first commented).

The other new clause of “A Villager with fewer than five Goals” is unnecessary; they’re defined as “Each Villager has a list of up to five Goals”, so a player giving themselves a sixth would be setting an illegal value.

against

Brendan: he/him

28-02-2023 12:27:36 UTC

I misunderstood how the fallback default would work, there. Withdrawn.  against