At least the most recent 730 days? Or any 730 non-consecutive days? Seems like an important enough distinction to mention.

There is no [Gamestate] tag but it doesn’t matter much lol.

TyGuy6, good point; how does it look now?

Cuddlebeam, well it’s more to indicate that it’s not affecting the dynastic rules or any non rule gamestate defined by the dynastic rules.

Excellent. Distinctive. Effective.

A good idea to think about this, but there’s a problem with this wording in that we can’t decisively determine who was and wasn’t idle at which time, without some serious detective work. The (admin-only?) members search only gives us the date of a player’s last visit, with no distinction between unidle gameplay and lurking while logged in.

If we instead phrased this as “any admin who has not visited the blog while logged in over the past 730 days”, we’d lose:

90000, aaronwinborn, alethiophile, Amnistar, Angry Grasshopper, arthexis, Axeling, Cayvie, Chivalrybean, ChronosPhaenon, Clucky, Darknight, Devenger, Elias IX, epylar, Excalabur, gobleteer, Greth, Hix, Jack, jay, Klisz, Larrytheturtle, lilomar, Ornithopter, Oze, Personman, Plorkyeran, Prince Anduril, Qwazukee, RaichuKFM, Rodney, Saki, Saurik, scshunt, Seebo, Seventy-Fifth Trombone, Shadowclaw, SingularByte, Skju, smith, southpointingchariot, Spitemaster, Tantusar, Thelonious, Thrawn, TrumanCapote, Wakukee, Yoda, Zeofar

(Seventy-Fifth Trombone is the player account of server owner 75th Trombone; it looks like the “75th” superadmin account is only ever used for server announcements and was never registered as a player, so is not technically an admin within the game.)

And we’d keep:

Brendan, Bucky, card, derrick, Ienpw III, Josh, Kevan, pokes, Purplebeard, quirck

in the absence of research to show who was idle and unidle. Would also be polite if lurking admins could easily exempt themselves from demotion without having to fully unidle.

I like the idea but we can polish the implementation bit more.

but I’d greentick a fix.