Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Proposal: Down with the queen!

Can’t enact with 6 votes against. Failed 2-6 by Kevan.

Adminned at 26 Oct 2012 02:11:42 UTC

In the rule “Stances” remove “Royalty, “. Also remove “Royalty: 0 ” from the rule “Public Opinion”. Remove “Pro-Royalty” and “Anti-Royalty” from the stances of all Editor, including idle ones. If the proposal “The Fourth Estate” passes, replace all instances of “Royalty” with “Sports” in the rule Editorials.

Its been pointed out that Royalty doesn’t really work in a lot of the locations. News events about Royalty can fit under both Celebrity and/or Government, so the whole category is rather redundant.

posted by Clucky at 24 Oct 2012 22:21:40 UTC Comments (9)

Comments

Josh: he/they

24-10-2012 22:52:06 UTC

against Six metrics feels like the right amount. I’d support this if it replaced rather than removed.

Bucky:

24-10-2012 23:18:41 UTC

imperial

spikebrennan:

24-10-2012 23:26:40 UTC

for

RaichuKFM: she/her

24-10-2012 23:48:52 UTC

imperial

Cpt_Koen:

25-10-2012 10:44:50 UTC

“Remove “Pro-Royalty” and “Anti-Royalty” from the stances of all Editor, including idle ones.”
Rule 1.2.1 Idle Editors: “When an Editor is unidled, if they went Idle in the same dynasty, their personal gamestate retains the last legally endowed values it had, if they are still valid.”
Doesn’t that mean an editor’s personal gamestate ceases to exist when they go idle, and reappear at the value it had when they idled when they deidle? In that case your provision wouldn’t be effective.

RaichuKFM: she/her

25-10-2012 10:54:03 UTC

But they won’t still be valid, so it seems still covered.

quirck: he/him

25-10-2012 11:52:31 UTC

imperial

IceFromHell:

25-10-2012 12:39:09 UTC

against

Kevan: Concierge he/him

25-10-2012 13:22:31 UTC

against Does feel like we need at least six subjects, even if this one isn’t great.