Proposal: Dynastic over core
Self-vetoed!!! Rodlen awesomely admined this.
Adminned at 20 Dec 2008 19:49:59 UTC
Add the following text to the end of rule 3 Glossary:
*In cases of conflict, dynastic rules override core rules.
Self-vetoed!!! Rodlen awesomely admined this.
Adminned at 20 Dec 2008 19:49:59 UTC
Add the following text to the end of rule 3 Glossary:
*In cases of conflict, dynastic rules override core rules.
There have been nomics which worked successfully by having new rules trump old, and many more that do it the other way. I see no good reason to favor one over the other generally - except that here in BlogNomic, favoring Dynastic rules makes the Dynasties even more distinct than normal.
until there are controls to allow at least SOME core rules to take precedence as needed.
Core rules should override dynasty rules. Prevents people from breaking the game.
What happened to the ‘specific trumps general’ rule in the ruleset?
I would rather us re-create the idea of Specific trumps general. This allows most dynastic rules to trump core.
Core over dynastic: breaks this dynasty, as it runs on a metadynasty with multiple Emperors, all able to veto.
Dynastic over core: won’t break this dynasty unless someone messes up.
Specific over general: may or may not break this dynasty, I can’t quite tell yet.
arthexis: he/him
Sounds good, but I still need to think it thoroughly.