Friday, December 19, 2008

Proposal: Dynastic over core

Self-vetoed!!! Rodlen awesomely admined this.

Adminned at 20 Dec 2008 19:49:59 UTC

Add the following text to the end of rule 3 Glossary:

*In cases of conflict, dynastic rules override core rules.

Comments

arthexis: he/him

19-12-2008 23:00:47 UTC

imperial Sounds good, but I still need to think it thoroughly.

Darknight: he/him

19-12-2008 23:05:16 UTC

against

Rodlen:

19-12-2008 23:06:50 UTC

Reasons, Darknight?

teucer:

19-12-2008 23:10:54 UTC

for

There have been nomics which worked successfully by having new rules trump old, and many more that do it the other way. I see no good reason to favor one over the other generally - except that here in BlogNomic, favoring Dynastic rules makes the Dynasties even more distinct than normal.

SingularByte: he/him

19-12-2008 23:17:53 UTC

for

Cayvie:

19-12-2008 23:22:44 UTC

against

this is scary with secret rules around (like last dynasty)

Yoda:

19-12-2008 23:27:14 UTC

for

Amnistar: he/him

19-12-2008 23:39:09 UTC

for

eljefe:

19-12-2008 23:41:17 UTC

for

Klisz:

19-12-2008 23:56:37 UTC

for

Amnistar: he/him

20-12-2008 00:31:13 UTC

8 - 2

(IMP=FOR because it’s proposed by our Watcher)

Sgeo:

20-12-2008 03:24:35 UTC

against until there are controls to allow at least SOME core rules to take precedence as needed.

Bucky:

20-12-2008 03:27:26 UTC

for

Clucky: he/him

20-12-2008 03:39:48 UTC

against
Core rules should override dynasty rules. Prevents people from breaking the game.

Oze:

20-12-2008 09:00:29 UTC

against Yup. We don’t want to break the game during this interesting round.

Amnistar: he/him

20-12-2008 13:53:24 UTC

What happened to the ‘specific trumps general’ rule in the ruleset?

Amnistar: he/him

20-12-2008 14:20:21 UTC

against I would rather us re-create the idea of Specific trumps general.  This allows most dynastic rules to trump core.

Rodlen:

20-12-2008 17:57:07 UTC

Core over dynastic: breaks this dynasty, as it runs on a metadynasty with multiple Emperors, all able to veto.

Dynastic over core: won’t break this dynasty unless someone messes up.

Specific over general: may or may not break this dynasty, I can’t quite tell yet.

zuff:

20-12-2008 20:10:41 UTC

for

arthexis: he/him

20-12-2008 22:41:44 UTC

against CoV as I have been turned unconvinced as of lately.

Klisz:

21-12-2008 03:36:26 UTC

against  to get the queue to move faster.

Rodlen:

21-12-2008 03:49:07 UTC

veto Self-veto!!!