Friday, February 25, 2022

Proposal: F*** B******

Timed out 5 votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 27 Feb 2022 18:11:52 UTC

Add a subrule entitled “Dynastic Discretion” to the rule “Parallel BlogNomic” as follows:

If the use of the Paralleliser leads to a random selection which is judged to be in poor taste or offensive, the Maestro Team Member may redo the random selection step in question to produce an alternative outcome.


Clucky: he/him

25-02-2022 18:15:49 UTC

might be good to clarify that the judgement is done by the Maestro Team Member. But definitely a good rule to have.

Brendan: he/him

25-02-2022 18:51:26 UTC

I think it’s worth leaving the wiggle room to have someone else bring up the issue, if the acting player didn’t see it at first.

Clucky: he/him

25-02-2022 19:14:05 UTC

Hrm so you’re thinking that someone could add a dynasty, someone else a bit later go “that is kinda offensive can we change it” and then you can go back and reroll?

Might cause some problems around player names and dynasty numbering if a emperor of a dynasty can change like that.

I was thinking this would be a “use good judgement on creation, and then after creation if something slips through we can use other tools like CfJs to clean it up”

Brendan: he/him

25-02-2022 19:25:08 UTC

I see your perspective, but for me, the CfJ window is when and if we “cause some problems around player names and dynasty numbering.”

Lulu: she/her

26-02-2022 01:53:36 UTC


Clucky: he/him

26-02-2022 03:36:58 UTC



26-02-2022 06:17:18 UTC



26-02-2022 06:55:50 UTC


Kevan: he/him

26-02-2022 08:23:15 UTC


Kevan: he/him

26-02-2022 08:24:01 UTC

(This isn’t yet at quorum because Tabbat is still idle.)