Some ambiguity on whether you’re asking for a vote on upholding the original actions which assigned no points, or the original actions plus this belated wiki correction to give Bucky 1 point that you applied an hour ago. I don’t know if it’s worth making it explicit that the correction is part of the DARKENED action, or if the obvious intention is enough.

I think that the CfJ isn’t needed to resolve the points issue, which can be remedied through a simple edit aligning the tracked gamestate to the values it should have (as JD has done).

The uphold is needed to ensure that JD’s incorrect closing comments don’t retroactively invalidate the closure of those entries, and therefore all subsequent play.

Josh summed it up nicely.

The CfJ instruction by itself is a little fuzzy, is all, by broadly saying to consider all past attempts to resolve this action to be valid. If Jonathan looked up tomorrow and said “oh wait, I already fixed this, I gave Bucky that point a few days later”, then this enacted CfJ would be pre-endorsing the view that giving Bucky the point twice was the full and proper completion of the action.

assuming that “the Resolving” just means the original wiki update and the correction an hour ago.