Proposal: Full Favor Economy
Quorums 4-0. — Quirck
Adminned at 05 Oct 2012 11:55:00 UTC
Add a new Rule to the Ruleset. Call it “Favors”, make the rule “Trading” a subrule of it, and give it the following text:
Each Student has a GNDT field “Favourâ€, which may name one other Student or idle Student. If a Student has a non-blank Favour field, they are considered to “owe a Favour†to the Student or idle Student named in it. If two Students owe each other Favors, any Student may blank both their Favor fields. A Student with a blank Favor field may set their Favor field to another Student at any time. A Student may blank any Favour field that contains their own name, at any time.
If a Game Action is a Favor Action from a Student (the Agent), any other Student with a blank Favor may set their Favor to the Agent to take that action, and the Student to whom the Agent owes a Favor may blank the Agent’s Favor field to take that action. No Student may take more than one Favor Action with the same Agent in a day or in any given 6-hour period.
Reword the rule “Trading” as follows:
If a Student (the “Traderâ€) wants to borrow a Pen that belongs to another Student (the “Tradeeâ€), and if both the Trader and Tradee have a Pen Colour, then the Trader may swap the Pen Colour values of the Trader and the Tradee as a Favor Action from the Tradee .
The pseudo-daily is to prevent Students from completely reversing a Favor relationship for two Favor Actions at once, or two cooperating students from taking a large number of consecutive Favor Actions.
Josh: he/they
Does this do anything except reword and tighten up the existing mechanic?