Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Proposal: [GNO] Gnomes or No Gnomes, That is the Question

Timed out, 4 - 1
Enacted by Elias IX

Adminned at 01 Jan 2009 13:11:47 UTC

SHHHH

211327859948539360559288041358614937675067762745997822012655457925499846
683129034668002428603450540330466186794376661600996061303443312866220151
494261539865813808500994930422224281895394159937904696365919511774901780
572573287587285322830940945346165786854023618172692264165350096072457933
844526693643448436016527331811799760473462642655795457400718142332067780
565693069396872553887167963888863625735926921312974881509384050147639975
485475973186612164338405909550326587687833414716749947207394806905950530
934731778598795077866597941605966309186065997171738034007950082544891673
4496569560866189226663165047403906523476014

Comments

Klisz:

30-12-2008 19:00:42 UTC

Wait, what?

Yoda:

30-12-2008 19:02:50 UTC

You are not in GNO, so you do not get to GNO what this says.

Elias IX:

30-12-2008 20:20:03 UTC

Good, but it says nothing about adding fields to the GNDT.

Bucky:

30-12-2008 21:11:47 UTC

for

Klisz:

30-12-2008 21:26:40 UTC

Oh yeah, the encryption.

teucer:

30-12-2008 22:31:26 UTC

imperial

I’m not yet in the gno about these things, despite being in GNO, so I have no opinion at this time.

Yoda:

30-12-2008 23:31:48 UTC

Elias: It doesn’t have to.  The GNDT is not Gamestate, merely a reflection of it.

Clucky: he/him

31-12-2008 02:55:56 UTC

against untill someone gives me the decyrption method… <_<

Rodney:

31-12-2008 17:53:44 UTC

for

teucer:

01-01-2009 17:34:54 UTC

for