Monday, December 22, 2008

hai guyz

Anyone want to win?

Step 1) Switch to BLO (its now monday, so you can do weekly actions again)
Step 2) Attempt to smash the ruleset to pieces
Step 3) Pick the victory sentence. With 2/21 odds you’ll be able to change “has” to “hasn’t” or “and” to “or”. Either one will give you victory.
Step 4) Declare victory!

Feel free to try and publish a block to this, but it’ll take 12 hours to pass. Its not something you guys can CfJ away without abusing the game.

With 20 of ya’ll, its statistically likely for one of you to get lucky.

posted by Clucky at 22 Dec 2008 02:19:01 UTC Comments (9)

Comments

teucer:

22-12-2008 02:34:21 UTC

With 20 of ya’ll, its statistically likely for one of you to get lucky.


...you clearly know nothing of my dating history.

Clucky: he/him

22-12-2008 02:35:25 UTC

So after talking with Amnistar, one might claim that “Rules existing only in a Faction’s Ruleset have no effect outside that Faction’s Gamestate and Ruleset. ” means you only win in BLO. But that is even more awesome. Win in BLO and make the new theme of BLO “BLO vs. GNO vs. MIC”.

Rinse. Lather. Repeat.

teucer:

22-12-2008 02:37:00 UTC

Yeah, it can get you a win in one of the three only.

That said, it can’t do that anymore, at least in one shot. I just smashed that sentence and got the word “fewer”. I replace it with “More.” I will need an admin to implement this.

Clucky: he/him

22-12-2008 03:00:18 UTC

didn’t you already do it less than 24 hours ago?

teucer:

22-12-2008 03:02:29 UTC

...yes, I did.

More significantly, I did it after the week changed over, although I thought I hadn’t and was thus in the clear. (It’s a weekly action.) My bad.

arthexis: he/him

22-12-2008 04:18:43 UTC

I did some smashing on my own to make this task a little harder on those who wanna try.

arthexis: he/him

22-12-2008 04:20:13 UTC

Oh, and also hasn’t is not in the same lexical category as has, because has is a contraction of has not.

Clucky: he/him

22-12-2008 04:38:00 UTC

lexical category is so poorly defined we can basically ignore it.

Cayvie:

22-12-2008 07:44:59 UTC

i um

i don’t actually think you want to start a syntax argument with teucer