BlogNomic: The First Dynasty of Desertfrog

Whoops, I completely agree. Probably a good idea to just undo it for being illegal since upholding this one instance won’t fix the actual rules.

I’ve undone the moving for being illegal. No need to uphold, we can just wait until it’s fixed. Will probably vote against this once the edit window is up

Actually, one uphold would fix it because it would have then allowed future moves of the Slug of Death to use this one as a “it’s been 24 hours since this move”

I could also just edit this one to fix the rule as well. It’s well within the edit window.

Up to you though. If you really would rather wait until the rule is fixed, we can just let this fail.

Eh, I find the idea of upholding a bit silly and would prefer to avoid it if I can. Seems strange to me to knowingly sit with an illegal gamestate under the knowledge that it will be retroactively legalized. A similar thing happened back in the Jenga dynasty, except worse since people were actually taking actions on the illegal gamestate.

(can’t withdraw a CfJ)

With the illegality uncontested and just taking this as “let’s say the Slug of Death moved 1cm eight hours ago”, I’d tend to against as non-urgent.

I would argue that “The slug of death last moved” being undefined as per “If a game variable has neither a default value nor a starting value, then both may be considered to be the nearest legal value to zero that it may take” then that value is set to be 0 time. And thus it has been 24 hours since “the slug of death last moved”

@Clucky: I don’t quite understand what side of this you’re arguing. If moving the Slug of Death was legal, then this CfJ is unnecessary.

I disagree. To me, the CfJ failing would indicate that the change should not be upheld (i.e. current gamestate on the tracking page is correct)