Thursday, February 17, 2022

Proposal: “If You Aren’t Winning, You Aren’t Gambling Enough”

3-6 with 11 players, so not enough not voting AGAINST to reach quorum. Failed by TyGuy6.

Adminned at 19 Feb 2022 03:48:55 UTC

If “Tic Tac Town” was enacted, replace ‘points’ throughout this proposal with ‘deeds’ and ‘point’ with ‘deed’ (ignoring capitalization).

Add a new dynastic rule, titled “Side-Betting” that reads:

Each player has a wager, which is a publicly tracked integer. As a daily action, a player may reduce their number of points by 1 and increase their wager by 1.

Each player has a Lock, which is publicly tracked, is either empty or a string containing the name of an active BlogNomic player. and defaults to empty. A player may update their Lock to read the name of any active BlogNomic player as a daily action. If a player’s Lock is invalid, then any player may set it to be empty.

If the atomic action that resets the board is defined in the ruleset, then append to it the following:

* Give every player whose Lock contains the name of the player who won the last round points equal to twice their wager.
* Set every Player’s wager to 0

Trying this again with the verb fixed


Lulu: she/her

17-02-2022 17:05:04 UTC

still not a huge fan of the bet mechanic, but ive softened enough to only merely vote DEF on this now

Brendan: he/him

17-02-2022 17:17:58 UTC

In favor.

Brendan: he/him

17-02-2022 21:23:04 UTC


Lulu: she/her

17-02-2022 21:35:33 UTC


wdtefv: hu/hum

17-02-2022 22:29:29 UTC


DragonSlayr15001: he/him

18-02-2022 00:51:18 UTC


Raven1207: he/they

18-02-2022 05:26:57 UTC


Darknight: he/him

18-02-2022 18:08:45 UTC


Clucky: he/him

19-02-2022 00:54:34 UTC


seems rather easy to just further reward winners by letting them update their lock to themselves right before they win

Lulu: she/her

19-02-2022 01:02:48 UTC

against cov


19-02-2022 03:47:03 UTC