Wednesday, August 19, 2020

Proposal: I’ll be there for you

Fewer than a quorum not voting against. (1 FOR, 2 AGA, 3 DEF, 1 IMPDEF → 1 FOR, 6 AGA) Failed by Kevan.

Adminned at 21 Aug 2020 10:49:48 UTC

When discovering a new location(and likewise a new distinct discovery) the pathfinder should travel there in person. This also means discovering a location should cost 1 extra stamina for travelling there.

Add to “Create a new location” in “Location” to be that of -

Daily action. Roll DICE8. If the result is higher than the number of Locations that are Linked to their current Location, then they may spend 3 Stamina to create a new Location with the characteristics set out above, set their location to the newly discovered location, then gain 2 Prestige.

Comments

derrick: he/him

19-08-2020 11:35:26 UTC

They should travel there, but not pay three stanima. Traveling there can be quite inconvenient.

You can edit your proposal for the first two hours unless someone votes on it.

Josh: Observer he/they

19-08-2020 13:05:11 UTC

I think increasing the stamina cost of creating a new location to being, de facto, 3 is a bit much. I would incorporate moving Location into the action, i.e. instead of “travel there which spends 1 stamina” just say “set their Location to the newly created Location”.

Kevan: he/him

19-08-2020 14:06:52 UTC

imperial Will leave this decision to the people with the legs.

Riggdan: he/him

19-08-2020 15:19:30 UTC

Yet leaves decision to himself…
isnt creating new location the fastest way to gain prestige? burning stamina through that seems to be a way to make a use of it

Lulu: she/her

19-08-2020 15:27:04 UTC

imperial

derrick: he/him

19-08-2020 15:29:53 UTC

Both ways to gain prestige require stanima in a 1 to 1 ratio and are daily actions. location creation has a failure chance.

@Josh: It might be useful to use travel as a key word so it can trigger effects. Though traveling to a new location is unlikely to. Traveling from a location might have consequences though.

Raven1207: he/they

19-08-2020 16:20:38 UTC

imperial

derrick: he/him

20-08-2020 12:07:47 UTC

against I had to think on this one, but I think I have to vote against merely making the current traveling option mandatory.

Riggdan: he/him

20-08-2020 16:47:34 UTC

imperial

Josh: Observer he/they

20-08-2020 22:35:29 UTC

Tepid against if only on the grounds that this is just replicating the status quo with less choice.

Bais:

21-08-2020 03:11:03 UTC

for I think it makes sense, thematically, that one would have to be in a place to discover it.

Kevan: he/him

21-08-2020 08:50:28 UTC

I think it’s also fine to think of it as seeing a new area, and a strange, unexamined lifeform or mineral, in the distance.