Thursday, July 17, 2025

Proposal: Key an Economised Variety of All Numbers

To the rule “Scoring”, add a paragraph:-

A Wordsmith’s Pool is made up of, for the most recent Scorings they have made on each Backronym that was posted since the last time an Acrogenerate action was performed, the number X in each Scoring’s “Score X”. If a Wordsmith’s Pool contains at least four different numbers (or no repeated numbers at all), then that Wordsmith is considered Balanced, otherwise they are considered Askew.

Then replace “For each Wordsmith that posted a Scoring to that Backronym” with:-

For each Balanced Wordsmith that posted a Scoring to that Backronym

Replace “A Scoring should reflect how much the commenter likes the Backronym, and how well they think it fits the Prompt (if the Prompt is not blank). ” with:-

A Scoring should reflect how much the commenter likes the Backronym, how well they think it fits the Prompt (if the Prompt is not blank), and any attempt they wish to make to spread the numbers in their Pool.

The Pool proposal revised as requested: only four numbers, and more thoughtful reflection.

I’ll omit the one-round delay since we’ve just started this one.

Comments

Bucky:

17-07-2025 19:20:19 UTC

against I really don’t want this to pass during the current round because it is likely I will be Askew when it passes and will have a different standard applied at Resolution time than at Scoring time.

And speaking of timing problems, it’s possible for a Wordsmith to be Balanced for some Backronyms and become Askew for later resolved ones, or vice versa.

Josh: he/they

17-07-2025 19:22:19 UTC

arrow Per Bucky. Should be offset from the current round.

JonathanDark: Puzzler he/him

17-07-2025 19:34:12 UTC

I’m not convinced that this is necessary anymore, but I’ll imperial to the affected players

Trapdoorspyder: he/him

17-07-2025 20:16:50 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

18-07-2025 00:27:30 UTC

arrow

You must be logged in as a player to post comments.