Proposal: Know your Allies, too
Reached quorum 8 votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan, charitably interpreting the ambiguous “Amend rule reviews” to mean “Amend the rule ‘The Reviewers’”.
Adminned at 14 Apr 2015 08:34:14 UTC
Amend rule reviews so that it reads as follows:
There are six Reviewers:
* Antonio Fusilli
* Bruce Haggis
* Chiaki Ramen
* Dominique Labaguette
* Esmeralda Paella
* Mad-Tongue MoodySome Reviewers are Special. Reviewers who are not Special are Regular.
Each Reviewer has a Sweet Spot for each of the existing Valued Properties. A Sweet Spot is an integer comprised between 0 and 10 included. Each Reviewer may be Vegetarian. Each Regular Reviewer has one Favourite Ingredient, which is one of the Ingredients listed in rule Ingredients. All the characteristics of the Regular Reviewers (Sweet Spots, Vegetarianism, Favourite Ingredient) are fixed and they shall be kept track of by the Restaurant Manager, who should reveal them only when allowed by the Ruleset. If one or more of a Reviewer’s characteristics has not been determined yet, the Restaurant Manager may and should privately determine it using a method of their choice.
Mad-Tongue Moody is a Special Reviewer. His Characteristics are well known to the staff of every Restaurant in Town, and they are:
* All his Sweet Spots are 10
* He is not Vegetarian.
Create a new sub-rule to rule Review, and call it “Interviews”:
When posting a Review, the Restaurant manager should disclose one of the Characteristics (a single Sweet Spot, Vegetarianism, or Favourite Ingredient if appliable) of the next Reviewer. They should pick which characteristic to reveal at random among the characteristics they have not yet revealed this way.
Was it just me or the blog has had some ups and downs lately?
Darknight: he/him