Sunday, March 30, 2025

Call for Judgment: Missing a Rung

Found unpopular with 1-5 and failed -SingularByte

Adminned at 31 Mar 2025 05:17:52 UTC

Remove 2 Equity from the Nomicer named SingularByte and add 1 Disc to the Spendables of the Nomicer named SingularByte.

Remove “Target” from the list of Sins.

From the Appendix:

Commentary

When posting a blog entry, a Nomicer may use the “Commentary or flavour text” field of the blog publishing form to add their own comments or description of their post. For the purposes of all other rules, such text is not considered to be part of the post.

Thus, the “Commentary or flavour text” field is not part of the post and cannot be used in a Ladder Combo.

Comments

Josh: Imperator he/they

30-03-2025 18:08:54 UTC

You can just revert an illegal action or correct the game state, right? Isn’t it likely that this is just going to result in SB being double-punished?

ais523:

30-03-2025 19:46:23 UTC

I agree with Josh: as written this double-punishes.

against because CFJs don’t have an edit window either this dynasty.

Josh: Imperator he/they

30-03-2025 20:01:14 UTC

against

JonathanDark: he/him

30-03-2025 20:17:17 UTC

You can, I just didn’t know if everyone agreed with this. If there is agreement, then sure, let’s just revert.

ais523:

30-03-2025 20:25:35 UTC

This sort of thing is why I recently tried to change the recommendation for dealing with gameplay disputes to discussing first, and CFJing only once an agreed path forwards (or the nature of any irreconcilable dispute) is known.

DoomedIdeas: he/him

31-03-2025 00:37:13 UTC

against I’m alright with simply reverting.

Darknight: he/him

31-03-2025 02:06:15 UTC

against

SingularByte: he/him

31-03-2025 05:11:25 UTC

against  in favour of just taking from me directly. I do not contest my equity being removed.