Saturday, September 15, 2012

Proposal: Named Achievements

Self-killed. -scshunt

Adminned at 17 Sep 2012 08:02:04 UTC

In the rule “Grading”, replace “Each Student has a non-negative integer number of Achievements, tracked in the GNDT” with “Each Student has a non-negative integer number of Achievements, tracked in the GNDT as a comma-separated list of the names of those Achievements”.

In the rule “Innovations Wanted”, replace “the Author of that Proposal Scores” with “the Author of that Proposal Scores the Achievement of Innovention”.

In the rule “Victory Practice Project” (if it exists), replace “they Score” with “they Score the Achievement of Referential Integrity”.

If any Student’s Achievements value is 0, change it to a blank string. If any Students have gained Achievements, replace the number of their current Achievements value with a comma-separated list of the current names of those Achievements.



09-16-2012 16:55:10 UTC



09-16-2012 17:13:46 UTC

against since quirk’s avoids huge GNDT fields.


09-16-2012 21:52:22 UTC


quirck: HE/HIM

09-17-2012 07:54:38 UTC

I don’t think it works well if my proposal passes

quirck: HE/HIM

09-17-2012 09:43:10 UTC


Kevan: HE/HIM

09-17-2012 11:32:32 UTC

against This does seem to interact badly with Quirck’s enacted version.

Josh: HE/HIM

09-17-2012 12:05:03 UTC



09-17-2012 14:46:27 UTC



09-17-2012 14:47:56 UTC

against per the above. quirck’s may have some corner cases but they may not arise in practice, and can be patched if/when they do.