Saturday, December 20, 2008

Proposal: No need for the G word.

already has 2 pending proposals—Yoda

Adminned at 20 Dec 2008 15:48:43 UTC

Considering the recent events, I think this is mostly unnecessary now. Furthermore it can also cause trouble, because it is passed implicitly down to the Factions. I also propose a fix to the recent comments towards the usage of in-faction CfJs.

Remove rule “2.4 G-Man (or is it?)” if it exists.

Append the following sentence to rule “Membership”

Calls for Judgement can never be Faction Posts.

 

posted by arthexis at 20 Dec 2008 21:23:02 UTC Comments (7)

Comments

Amnistar: he/him

20-12-2008 21:38:20 UTC

for

SingularByte: he/him

20-12-2008 21:41:06 UTC

for

Oze:

20-12-2008 21:41:20 UTC

for

Klisz:

20-12-2008 22:25:16 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

20-12-2008 23:24:04 UTC

for

Yoda:

20-12-2008 23:30:44 UTC

for

Yoda:

20-12-2008 23:48:05 UTC

Unfortunately, since the proposal “Making things a bit more clear” has not passed yet, arth’s 2 previous proposals are made in the Blognomic gamestate making this his third pending proposal and therefore illegal.