Saturday, December 15, 2012

Proposal: No overstuffed GNDT

Can’t enact with 2 votes for and 10 against. Failed by Kevan.

Adminned at 16 Dec 2012 02:41:23 UTC

If the Proposal “Infamy, Infamy, They’ve All Got It In For Me” fails, this proposal does nothing.
Create a Wiki Page entitled “Cults” and blank that page.
In the rule “Infamy”, replace

The Infamy of a Cult may be tracked in the GNDT; For the purposes of this, Cults may be set up and tracked in the GNDT.

with

The Name and Infamy of each Cult is tracked in the Wiki page “Cults”.

Comments

quirck: he/him

15-12-2012 14:47:14 UTC

for

Josh: Announcer he/him

15-12-2012 14:48:00 UTC

against

Sphinx:

15-12-2012 15:09:54 UTC

I do prefer a wiki page for the cults, however, I think that name tracking should be defined in the rule “Cults” and not “Infamy”

Igthorn:

15-12-2012 15:56:36 UTC

against

Sphinx:

15-12-2012 16:06:13 UTC

against , just submitted my own proposal for the wiki page.

Kevan: he/him

15-12-2012 18:15:38 UTC

against Wouldn’t it be easier to just track Infamy in the text of Rule 2.1, given that that’s how we’re tracking the Names?

Sphinx:

15-12-2012 18:43:10 UTC

I think, that there might very well come more information to each cult, so tracking the cults and their states in their own wiki page would make things easier and clearer than tracking that information in the GNDT or in a rule…

Sphinx:

15-12-2012 18:55:34 UTC

Basicaly, I am just against tracking cults in the GNDT, tracking them in the ruleset or in their own wiki page would both be ok for me, but I think their own wiki page would make it a little bit less messy.

Argon14:

15-12-2012 18:56:04 UTC

against

Purplebeard:

15-12-2012 19:13:52 UTC

against

Clucky: he/him

15-12-2012 19:52:58 UTC

against

scshunt:

15-12-2012 20:35:49 UTC

for

scshunt:

15-12-2012 20:52:42 UTC

against since it won’t pass anyway and to clear the queue

Klisz:

15-12-2012 21:18:32 UTC

against

Cpt_Koen:

16-12-2012 01:19:00 UTC

imperial Per scshunt and per Kevan.