Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Proposal: Order Adjustment

Passed with 4 fors, 1 against, and a lot of abstains. —Rodlen

Adminned at 26 Feb 2009 17:37:42 UTC

Replace the sentence “Only the first person to dispute an order has his loyalty changed as a result of disputing it.” in dynastic rule General’s Orders with “Only the first person every two consecutive days, starting with the first dispute of the order, to dispute a specific order has his loyalty changed as a result of disputing it.”

Add the following to the end of dynastic rule General’s Orders:

A Soldier may not dispute more than one order in a single comment.

“I saw our enemies for the first time today.  And they were us.  We are they.  We are our own enemies.  They have our faces, our uniforms, our guns.  We are led by two different people: Amnistar and ratsinmA, but other than that, we are the same.  They are us, and we are they.  And I wonder: Why are we fighting?”—A dead enemy’s journal.

Comments

Rodlen:

25-02-2009 00:14:46 UTC

The purpose of this is clarification and to allow an order to be disputed more than once, with different loyalty changes.

Wakukee:

25-02-2009 00:15:04 UTC

for

Qwazukee:

25-02-2009 00:57:07 UTC

imperial  arrow

I think there’s a problem with this, but I’ll leave Amni to figure it out.

Wakukee:

25-02-2009 04:12:00 UTC

Wait… but if an order is disputed, it will be gotten rid of no matter what the response… CoV against

Klisz:

25-02-2009 16:25:20 UTC

imperial

Clucky: he/him

25-02-2009 17:14:34 UTC

for

Devenger:

25-02-2009 19:04:04 UTC

imperial I’d prefer if disputes were just limited to daily actions, too.

Wakukee:

25-02-2009 21:34:21 UTC

“Only the first person every two consecutive days, starting with the first dispute of the order, to dispute a specific order has his loyalty changed as a result of disputing it.”

Look, this will have no effect, as the challenged order is automatically removed!

Wakukee:

25-02-2009 21:34:40 UTC

Seriously!

Wakukee:

25-02-2009 21:39:11 UTC

WTF?!? See! This is why I hate having to use flavor text in votes >: ( grrr… This was not my fault! Blame Amni and his orders.

Darknight: he/him

26-02-2009 00:22:20 UTC

imperial Btw, how the heck did Wak’s name become italic?

Kevan: he/him

26-02-2009 13:01:31 UTC

He left an italic tag open, and closed it in a later comment.

Klisz:

26-02-2009 20:58:02 UTC

Klisz:

26-02-2009 20:58:25 UTC

You mean like this?

Kevan: he/him

26-02-2009 21:17:52 UTC

Yes, like that. And oh, I haven’t voted:-

for

Qwazukee:

26-02-2009 22:02:13 UTC

CoV for  arrow

How come Amni never resolves these?