(Moved to the proposal category as this “appears to the Yard to have been intended as a Proposal”.)

This feels like a “win-more” proposal - if you’re already doing well for a day this is great, but it could also create some difficult-to-overcome leads

I have the opposite take. It’s the dish that was purchased the most, so it would have to be a dish with common ingredients among at least two Trucks, and thus be the lowest-price dish among them (absent any Fixtures). Whoever got that would certainly be doing well, but could be outdone by other trucks with more unique dishes at higher prices.

Right, the intent is to create more competition which means brutal pricing undercutting with lower profit margins. Its just another strategy to take.

don’t like the win-more take to it; and no (tomorrow)

Oh, you have tomorrow; but the first point still stands

also; JD; the lowest-price dish among them could be 20/20/19.

I think I’d be more supportive if if weren’t possible for this to kick in for a dish that was only bought once.

[Trapdoorspyder] [Chiiika] You’ve both mentioned “win-more” but haven’t really explained what that means. It seems that the implication here is that someone is getting free money because they’re ahead. This mechanism is actually a great remedy for anyone looking to overcome “difficult-to-overcome leads” since anyone can trigger it.

[Chiiika] I don’t see the point you’re making with a 20/20/19 scenario.

[Josh] I do get this one. What are your thoughts on a rewrite to say that the Dish must be purchased more than once to become the Dish of the Day?

I agree with Josh on the point that the Dish of the Day should have to be bought more than once.

The Dish of the Day would probably need some other indicator than most purchased, given that most dishes are purchased only once.