Reaches quorum and passes, 11-0. Josh
Adminned at 21 Dec 2010 01:02:18 UTC
If the Proposals titled “Hard Hats†or “Grab bag!†failed, this Proposal does nothing.
Enact the effect of the proposal titled “Grab Bag!â€, ignoring the contingent on rule “Hard Hats†and replace “In the rule Hard Hats, after†with “In the rule Currency, afterâ€.
This could set a dangerous precedent, so I’ll leave it to Josh since he’s been around forever.
Why is it dangerous? Its the exact same thing as re-proposing word for word, (modulo the phrasing at the start) but does it better.
Arg, I don’t want the pressure.
I would have voted anyway.
Clucky: Hmm. It seems I’ve misread it as something along the lines of retroactively changing the proposal content.
CoV
Although this does make a bit of a mess. While the main bulk of Grab Bag does nothing, the clauses that affect sub-rules (“Flat bricks” and “Bricks”) will still enact with that proposal, and will be duplicated if this passes as well. We’ll just have to propose to get rid of the redundancy.
No Josh, the proposal says “If the rule Hard Hats doesn’t exist, this proposal does nothing”.
The rule “Hard Hats” doesn’t exist. So the proposal does nothing. Even the two later clauses do nothing. So there will be no redundancy.
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
Subrincinator: