Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Proposal: Quorum housekeeping

Passes 16 :for: and 0 :against:—Wakukee

Adminned at 22 May 2009 14:10:32 UTC

In Rule 3.3 “Keywords”, rewrite the text that presently reads:

Quorum is equal to half the number of Contestants, rounded down, plus one.

so that it reads:

Quorum is equal to half the number of Contestants, rounded down, plus one.  If a Rule or other Gamestate document refers to a Quorum of some subset of Contestants (such as a Quorum of Contestants who share a particular Gamestate attribute, but excluding all other Contestants) then Quorum is equal to half the number of Contestants who share that Gamestate attribute, rounded down, plus one.

There’s a reference in Rule 2.1.1 to a “Quorum of Insiders”, which is a concept that is not presently defined in the ruleset.

Comments

redtara: they/them

20-05-2009 20:13:53 UTC

for  for

ais523:

20-05-2009 20:26:48 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

20-05-2009 20:29:37 UTC

for Good catch.

Wakukee:

20-05-2009 20:51:59 UTC

for nice.

Bucky:

20-05-2009 21:03:39 UTC

against  Quorum of contestants = “A number of Insiders equal to half the number of Contestants, rounded down, plus 1.”

redtara: they/them

20-05-2009 21:07:50 UTC

This rule may be applicable in other circumstances, Bucky…

Influenza:

20-05-2009 21:20:12 UTC

for

Yoda:

20-05-2009 21:33:38 UTC

for I don’t see how you get that, Bucky.

Klisz:

20-05-2009 21:47:55 UTC

for

Qwazukee:

20-05-2009 22:04:00 UTC

I’m pretty sure Bucky’s is the only interpretation that makes set under the current Ruleset. However, I think the Ruleset should be ammended to Spikebrennen’s definition.

for

Darknight: he/him

20-05-2009 22:15:09 UTC

for

smith:

21-05-2009 04:30:27 UTC

for useful

delta:

21-05-2009 08:34:41 UTC

for Not sure what Bucky is saying ...

TAE:

21-05-2009 11:10:57 UTC

for

arthexis: he/him

21-05-2009 15:33:38 UTC

for

Bucky:

21-05-2009 20:29:02 UTC

CoV against -> for

SingularByte: he/him

22-05-2009 08:43:18 UTC

for