Sunday, January 26, 2020

Proposal: [Special Case] Where You Lead, I Won’t Follow

Fewer than a quorum not voting against. Failed 1-5 by Kevan.

Adminned at 26 Jan 2020 21:04:24 UTC

To the end of the Special Case rule Imperial Deferentials, add:

In this case, the Deferential votes of other Individuals are valid votes but count as neither FOR nor AGAINST.

I find it weird that proposals are passing with 1 FOR vote and 5 imperial DEFs.

Of course, all this really changes is the pace at which things can be enacted or failed, rather than the actual outcome.


Tantusar: HE/THEY

01-26-2020 11:31:23 UTC

against I like the interaction.


01-26-2020 11:57:15 UTC

I find it surprising that so many people are casting votes of “I don’t care, I’ll go with the majority on this one” on gameplay proposals in a very factional dynasty. Is this intentional, or are some players misunderstanding the consequences of a DEF vote?


01-26-2020 13:06:53 UTC

against I like the interaction too, because I feel like there should be a strong sway to either FOR or AGAINST to get Proposals done sooner, and DEFs are voluntary anyways.

Tantusar: HE/THEY

01-26-2020 13:27:28 UTC

[In the case this passes, I’m assuming you mean deferential and not differential. This is the SCP Dynasty, not the Car Maintenance Dynasty.]

Josh: HE/HIM

01-26-2020 15:32:19 UTC


Does that count as a typo?

Tantusar: HE/THEY

01-26-2020 15:41:40 UTC

Well it’s that or the proposal fizzles because it does nothing.


01-26-2020 17:53:29 UTC

against If there’s a problem here, it’s that players are casting votes of “majority should decide” when they don’t mean it. That’s something that can be fixed by talking to those players, if it needs fixing at all. If they mean it, we may as well play on.


01-26-2020 17:53:59 UTC

(I think it counts as a typo, particularly in the age of autocorrect.)


01-26-2020 20:56:39 UTC

against although i think this proposal would be fine if it introduced a vote of Majority for players to use in cases where they are unconcerned with the outcome, since that would make it clearer their intentions.

Darknight: HE/HIM

01-26-2020 21:03:20 UTC