Proposal: The Bigger They Are
Enacted with quorum, 4-0. Josh
Adminned at 20 Feb 2024 14:58:32 UTC
If “Bigger Walls” is not enacted, this Proposal has no effect.
In the subrule “Structures”, replace the sentence beginning with “At any time, a Vassal may Upgrade one of their Structures that is not Gargantuan” with this text:
At any time, a Vassal may Upgrade one of their Structures that is not Gargantuan by spending an amount of each Material listed in the Structure’s Cost equal to the following rates, according to the Size being changed, and then changing the Size of that Structure accordingly as follows: 2 to change from Small to Medium, 3 to change from Medium to Large, and 5 to change from Large to Gargantuan.
For each publicly tracked Vassal’s Structures, the format for publicly tracking is “Name:Value”, where “Name” is the Name of the Structure, and “Value” is the Current Defensive Value, which is a number that defaults to the amount listed in the table for that Structure, multiplied by the following rates according to Size: 1 for Small, 2 for Medium, 3 for Large, and 5 for Gargantuan.
In the rule “Castles” remove the text “Each Vassal has a publicly-tracked number named Defense defaulting to 0.”
I think that increasing the Size of a Structure should require more resources as you go up in size.
I’m also introducing the notion of “Current Defensive Value”, as this can play into Structures being damaged by the Waves of enemies.
JonathanDark: he/him
Don’t be scared off by the larger amounts of resources. There’s a reason that the number of total Serfs is tracked. I intended for there to be a way to get more Serfs.