Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Proposal: Where do I stand?

This proposal was found to have veiws that dissented with the opinion of the government.  Until further notice, this proposal shall be held at an undisclosed location.

That is all.

General Amnistar

Adminned at 11 Feb 2009 14:58:41 UTC

Create a new rule called “Ranks”:

Each Soldier has a Rank, tracked in the GNDT. At any time, a Soldier may set their Rank to highest possible for which that Soldier meets all requisites.  If a Rank has no requisites listed, no Soldier may set eirself to that Rank unless another Rule or Proposal explicitly allows so. The following is a list of Ranks in order from highest to lowest, as well as their requisites, after a colon.

# General
# Brigadier
# Colonel
# Major
# Captain
# Lieutenant
# Sergeant
# Corporal
# Private: The Soldier does not meet the requisites of a higher Rank.

Comments

arthexis: he/him

11-02-2009 19:46:43 UTC

The funky #‘s are for making enactment easier.

Amnistar: he/him

11-02-2009 19:52:19 UTC

for Though whenever we make ranks have meaning, we’ll need to reset everyone’s ranks to private since yo ucan set it to whatever now.

Hix:

11-02-2009 19:53:49 UTC

against There is absolutely no need to confuse the issue by making a “General” rank.  Also, there is a contradiction.  “Each soldier has a Rank”, but there is no initialization procedure specified.

Amnistar: he/him

11-02-2009 19:56:55 UTC

against per hix

ais523:

11-02-2009 20:09:19 UTC

against Good proposal, but buggy. I suggest you propose a fixed version. (If you self/kill it, amni will probably veto it to save time.)

Klisz:

11-02-2009 20:13:12 UTC

I was thinking about something like this, but against  per Hix.

Once we have a better version, we should make the victory condition to get to the highest rank.

Amnistar: he/him

11-02-2009 20:15:15 UTC

I like exploding things.

Klisz:

11-02-2009 20:24:17 UTC

General Amnistar, as your unofficial advisor, I recommend you use the veto  grenade.

Wooble:

11-02-2009 20:31:37 UTC

imperial

Devenger:

11-02-2009 21:18:43 UTC

against

off-topic: reminds me of Rodlen’s ranks, where I had the ability to give people energy and stuff because of my rank… consider making some of the ranks ‘support roles’. Because I don’t want to win a dynasty, I just want to influence who wins!

Amnistar: he/him

11-02-2009 21:26:34 UTC

that would be an alternative idea, rather then positions, roles:

Medic; Heavy Weapons; Communications; etc.

Wakukee:

11-02-2009 21:30:19 UTC

imperial

Qwazukee:

11-02-2009 21:45:06 UTC

against

Wooden Squid:

11-02-2009 22:33:57 UTC

against

arthexis: he/him

11-02-2009 22:56:45 UTC

against ->  veto

Amnistar: he/him

11-02-2009 22:57:43 UTC

veto BOOOOOM