Thursday, January 24, 2019

Proposal: A bounty of herring

Times out/reaches quorum, 5-0 (w/ 1 imperial deferential). Enacted by pokes.

Adminned at 26 Jan 2019 13:42:53 UTC

If “More tasteful red herrings” has been enacted, In the list of bullet points for an Investigation:
* Replace “Roll a ten-sided die.” with “Roll a six-sided die.”
* Replace “If the Search Result is 6 or above” with “If the Search Result is 2 or above”
* Replace “If the Target is Dogged, and has found a Disproof Clue during this Search,” with “If the Target is Dogged, has found a Disproof Clue during this Search, and this is the first Investigation of the Target during this Search,”

Re-balance finding clues if weakened by herring


Kevan: he/him

24-01-2019 14:21:53 UTC



24-01-2019 14:51:58 UTC



24-01-2019 20:42:27 UTC

So someone who is Observant will get a clue every single time? against The smaller dice will also make Alcoholic a bigger deal as well.

derrick: he/him

25-01-2019 18:21:23 UTC


Its a touch of overkill.


25-01-2019 22:25:08 UTC

hmm, there are actually some good points here.

imperial CoV


25-01-2019 22:41:13 UTC

With red herrings, but with only a 1/2 chance of getting a clue, I think we’re setting up a very long game.


25-01-2019 22:56:09 UTC

for CoV again, my main problem was Observant Detectives being able to get clues every time, but I think I’ll just propose to change that instead of withdrawing support here.


26-01-2019 02:23:08 UTC

for CoV due to new proposal.

derrick: he/him

26-01-2019 12:37:23 UTC

for CoV