Friday, January 20, 2023

Abilene Paradox Test

End the current dynasty without a winner and begin a Meta-Dynasty

I am expecting this to fail, but I’m just testing in the event we have an Abilene Paradox and nobody really likes this style of gameplay.


Benbot: he/him

20-01-2023 16:36:54 UTC


Josh: he/they

20-01-2023 16:48:25 UTC


Kevan: he/him

20-01-2023 16:49:39 UTC

This doesn’t count as a proposal, as it’s not in the proposal category. (You’d still be in the 15-minute window to correct that, except that by adding a comment to it you’ve locked yourself out of doing so.)

I suppose voting to “end” a dynasty might be enough to informally consider the group to now be playing the next dynasty, for historical purposes, and “begin a Meta-Dynasty” is probably enough to implicitly remove the Onlooker role from Trapdoorspyder, but absent of further instructions we’d continue playing under the same dynastic ruleset.

I would vote against this were it a proposal.

Benbot: he/him

20-01-2023 17:12:02 UTC

I’m sorry

Raven1207: he/they

20-01-2023 17:13:38 UTC



20-01-2023 17:13:42 UTC

No actual harm done.

JonathanDark: Publisher he/him

20-01-2023 17:16:08 UTC