Friday, January 20, 2023

Abilene Paradox Test

End the current dynasty without a winner and begin a Meta-Dynasty

I am expecting this to fail, but I’m just testing in the event we have an Abilene Paradox and nobody really likes this style of gameplay.

posted by Benbot at 20 Jan 2023 16:34:13 UTC Comments (7)

Comments

Benbot: he/him

20-01-2023 16:36:54 UTC

imperial

Josh: he/they

20-01-2023 16:48:25 UTC

against

Kevan: he/him

20-01-2023 16:49:39 UTC

This doesn’t count as a proposal, as it’s not in the proposal category. (You’d still be in the 15-minute window to correct that, except that by adding a comment to it you’ve locked yourself out of doing so.)

I suppose voting to “end” a dynasty might be enough to informally consider the group to now be playing the next dynasty, for historical purposes, and “begin a Meta-Dynasty” is probably enough to implicitly remove the Onlooker role from Trapdoorspyder, but absent of further instructions we’d continue playing under the same dynastic ruleset.

I would vote against this were it a proposal.

Benbot: he/him

20-01-2023 17:12:02 UTC

I’m sorry

Raven1207: he/they

20-01-2023 17:13:38 UTC

against

Bucky:

20-01-2023 17:13:42 UTC

No actual harm done.

JonathanDark: Puzzler he/him

20-01-2023 17:16:08 UTC

against