Monday, April 13, 2020

Proposal: Bank It Up

Self Killed—Clucky

Adminned at 14 Apr 2020 23:28:39 UTC

Replace the text of the rule “Replacement” with

Each Island has a numeric value of Bells which defaults to 0 and is tracked in the Islands section of the “Archipelago” wiki page

Add a new Dynastic Rule called Spite

Each Player has a positive integer number of Spite which is tracked in the Players section of the “Archipelago” wiki page and defaults to 0. Spite can be spent it the following ways

* A Player may spend 3 Spite to add a new Villagers as outlined in the rule “Villagers”, bypassing the traditional weekly action limit
* A Player may spend 5 Spite and pick any Island. They roll a FRUIT and change the Native Fruit of that Island to the result
* A Player may spend 10 Spite and remove a Villager from the game

Append the following to the last paragraph of “Islands”

If immediately prior to this step the Villager was a Resident of a different Island, the Mayor of that Island gains 1 Spite

Add the follow to the list of Tasks

* Collect: 10% of the Villager’s Bells (rounded down) are transferred from the Island the Player.
* Heist: Roll a DICE100 and transfer the resulting number of Bells from the Island which the Villager is a Resident of to the Villager. If the Resulting number is greater than the number of Bells on that Island, instead transfer all of the Bells on that Island to the Villager. If the Player is not the Mayor of the Island the Villager is the Resident of, the Mayor of the Island gains 1 Spite.

For each Player that had any Bells when this proposal was enacted, if they are the Mayor of an Island put that many Bells in their Island.

Making getting bells more in line with what I was shooting for in this dynasty

Comments

Darknight: he/him

13-04-2020 06:15:42 UTC

imperial

Brendan: he/him

13-04-2020 15:09:25 UTC

for Ah, yes.

naught:

13-04-2020 16:01:14 UTC

for  Though I think you mean the rule “Repayment,” not “Replacement.” I’m fairly certain it’s legal of you to change it, per “Spelling” in the Appendix rule “Clarifications.”

Kevan: he/him

13-04-2020 16:39:16 UTC

imperial

Clucky: he/him

13-04-2020 17:00:22 UTC

@Naught oof not sure how I messed that up I thought I just copied it. I donno if it counts as a spelling mistake though as its clearly still a valid word… what do others think?

Kevan: he/him

13-04-2020 18:47:53 UTC

Hmm, I’m starting to find it hard to know what to propose in this dynasty when I’ve no context for any given mechanic (is this a revered mechanic from the videogame which it would be rude to amend, a general homage in the spirit, a deliberate joke at its expense, or none of the above?), so I think I’ll just idle out. Quorum remains 7.

pokes:

14-04-2020 01:12:06 UTC

against per the Repayment/Replacement thing, and also: “from the Island the Player” is ambiguous and I don’t want to leave it up to fixing an “obvious” mistake. Is it the the Island to the player, or the Island of the Player, and if it’s the latter, what does that mean if there are multiple Islands belonging to the player?

Trigon:

14-04-2020 01:31:54 UTC

against for the same reasons as pokes.

Clucky: he/him

14-04-2020 05:28:16 UTC

” the Island the Player.” is def a typo that can be fixed. But I guess it doesn’t hurt to just repropose with the bugs fix

Clucky: he/him

14-04-2020 05:32:51 UTC

against