Sunday, January 17, 2010

Proposal: Because it doesn’t hurt to have this

Reached quorum, passed 17-2—Rodlen

Adminned at 17 Jan 2010 14:42:07 UTC

Add the following text to the end of rule 1.10 Free Play:

*A Guest should not do any action meant to make the game unplayable (for example, changing multiple keywords to the same word in an ascension address).

Just something I’ve been thinking about for a while.

Change two keywords to the same word, and the game’s pretty much ruined.

Comments

Thrawn:

17-01-2010 08:32:41 UTC

for

TrumanCapote:

17-01-2010 08:55:39 UTC

against

NoOneImportant:

17-01-2010 09:18:35 UTC

against

Should not br limited to guests. Should apply to emperors too.

Josh: Observer he/they

17-01-2010 09:19:35 UTC

for Emperors are considered to be guests for the purposes of the core rules - the distinction only exists for dynastic rules.

Excalabur:

17-01-2010 09:32:23 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

17-01-2010 12:05:17 UTC

for

Anonyman:

17-01-2010 12:15:35 UTC

for

spikebrennan:

17-01-2010 12:22:35 UTC

for

Oze:

17-01-2010 12:26:34 UTC

for

There:

17-01-2010 13:38:26 UTC

for

Purplebeard:

17-01-2010 13:45:51 UTC

for

Roujo: he/him

17-01-2010 15:49:58 UTC

for But… Isn’t rule 1.10 named “Fair Play”, not “Free Play”?

Klisz:

17-01-2010 16:26:38 UTC

for  Though Roujo is right. Of course, one can always change a keyword to “Proposal”.

redtara: they/them

17-01-2010 18:47:11 UTC

for

Dustin:

17-01-2010 20:31:07 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

17-01-2010 20:52:50 UTC

for I’d chulk the mis-name to typo error

alethiophile:

17-01-2010 21:06:05 UTC

for

Rodlen:

17-01-2010 22:36:33 UTC

...How the heck did I manage to make that mistake!?!

Rodlen:

17-01-2010 22:37:11 UTC

Darth: However, that would also be stopped by the “no destroying the game” rule.

Nausved:

17-01-2010 22:37:23 UTC

for