The reason I think it’s important is that “No Private Communication” needs to have teeth, otherwise people will intentionally flaunt it knowing that they can get away with disclosing only vague generalities.

And to be clear, I don’t think Josh did anything intentionally. I’m very certain it was accidental. Nevertheless, it’s important to set expectations.

Honestly? I think Mentors should be able to talk about gamestate stuff; otherwise the mentee wouldn’t understand some of the logic esp. regarding voting and stuff; but I’ll propose another that amend mentors.

This doesn’t work as intended; it has the same loophole as the existing text. If you want disclosures to contain a full transcript of the offending dialogue then it doesn’t make sense to dance around that.

CoV ref Josh

double CoV for the possibility of revision not costing a slot

Ok, if “the details of what was discussed” isn’t enough, I’ll withdraw and we can try something more explicit if necessary