Tuesday, August 11, 2015

Proposal: Call Stack

Reached quorum 6 votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan.

Adminned at 13 Aug 2015 09:37:27 UTC

In the rule “Tools of the Trade”, replace

As a daily action, a Hacker may add a Subroutine to the Tool of any Codename.

with

As a daily action, a Hacker may add a Subroutine to the right of the Tool of any Codename.

.

Replace

& - Back Door - Replicates the effect of another Subroutine in this Tool, of the Codename’s choosing

with

& - Back Door - Replicates the effect of another Subroutine in this Tool to the right of this Back Door. The Subroutine to be replicated may be chosen before making a Hack by the Hacker who controls this Codename.

Replace

2 - Amplifier - If this is the leftmost Amplifier in the Tool, then the Hack Value of this Tool is doubled.

with

2 - Amplifier - If this is the leftmost Subroutine in the Tool, then the Hack Value of this Tool is doubled.

Replace

All Back Doors after a Root Access are removed.

with

After a Hack Attempt with this Tool, all Back Doors after a Root Access are removed.

If the proposal ‘Icing Up’ is enacted, replace in the rule “Corporate Defence”

At any time, a Hacker may reduce its Corp Name’s Defence Score or Secrets by 1 to add any Security Measure to that Corp Name.

with

At any time, a Hacker may reduce its Corp Name’s Defence Score or Secrets by 1 to add any Security Measure to the right of the Security Measures list of that Corp Name.

If the proposal ‘Icing Up’ is enacted, replace in the rule “Tools of the Trade”

@ - Blaster - Reduce the Defence Value of the target Corp Name by 1 permanently before carrying out a Hack with this Tool

with

@ - Blaster - Before carrying out a Hack with this Tool, permanently destroy the rightmost Security Measure of target Corp Name or, if target Corp Name has no Security Measures, reduce the defence Value of the target Corp Name by 1 permanently

I hope this isn’t too much for one proposal.

I think that having the Subroutines Stack instead of Array Increases the value of Positioning and fits the theme better.

Also, several clarifications.

Comments

Winner:

11-08-2015 20:59:03 UTC

Not sure about the changes to Amplifier, but everything else seems good. for

Kevan: he/him

12-08-2015 07:48:25 UTC

imperial Yes, this makes Amplifiers useless.

Lengthy proposals are fine, they’re just generally less likely to pass because there’s more chance of them including a broken or unpopular clause.

Josh: Observer he/they

12-08-2015 08:32:16 UTC

for

Purplebeard:

12-08-2015 18:02:34 UTC

for

Darknight: he/him

12-08-2015 22:04:23 UTC

imperial