Wednesday, June 14, 2006

Call for Judgment: Cheating

There seems to be consensus that this is not a legal CfJ
(Even if it were, it would have definitely failed)
—Hix

Adminned at 15 Jun 2006 10:43:40 UTC

James mullard has been repeatedly vandalising the site with stupid posts and stupid changes of stats.

Comments

Thelonious:

14-06-2006 13:24:23 UTC

This isn’t a valid CfJ.  It doesn’t meet any of the criteria in 1.6.

against

Bucky:

14-06-2006 14:03:58 UTC

against While I agree with the statement, I disagree with the proposed solution.

Hix:

14-06-2006 16:11:04 UTC

against

Angry Grasshopper:

14-06-2006 16:34:13 UTC

Meaningless as it stands. You could instead propose to censure em, or propose any other remedy you think appropriate.

against, but only to empty the queue

Isolde:

15-06-2006 00:36:03 UTC

against

Alcazar:

15-06-2006 02:36:11 UTC

(sigh)

for

Alcazar:

15-06-2006 02:36:37 UTC

against
/me grins

TAE:

15-06-2006 12:11:53 UTC

against
I tend to agree with Thelonious.  CfJ’s need to propose some sort of alteration in order to mean anything