Sunday, December 30, 2018

Proposal: Digging Dirt

Reaches quorum, 5-0. Enacted by pokes.

Adminned at 03 Jan 2019 00:33:37 UTC

In “Cases”, replace “For each Party in the Case whose Attorney made a comment on the Case’s blog post which included an AGAINST icon, decrease that Party’s Guilt for this Case by 1 (to a minimum of zero)” with:-

For each Party in the Case whose Attorney made a comment on the Case’s blog post which included an AGAINST icon, increase the other Party’s Guilt for this Case by 1

Making underhand tactics (which we have seen none of so far) more useful, in situations where both Clients may already be at Guilt Zero.

Comments

edelopo:

12-30-2018 21:57:29 UTC

for I was thinking precisely the same. What is the purpose of underhand tactics as they are right now?

Zaphod:

12-31-2018 02:40:30 UTC

I think underhand tactics increase your slush fund, but so far that has no advantage other than secrecy. Is there a risk of this leading to attorneys waiting to post comments until the last minute if a clients’ guilt is zero?

Kevan: HE/HIM

12-31-2018 11:02:20 UTC

[edelopo] Right now, if your Client has a Guilt of 3 or more you can use both a FOR and an AGAINST to bring that down.

[Zaphod] No, no risk of that as there is no “last minute” any more - Cases can only be closed after a full 24 hours of silence.

pokes:

01-01-2019 14:14:24 UTC

for

Zaphod:

01-02-2019 03:24:28 UTC

for
Thanks for the clarification, Kevan.

naught: PAST MEMORY

01-02-2019 06:42:00 UTC

for