Thursday, February 12, 2009

Proposal: Frags

The term ‘Frag’ has been deemed unsuited for use in this instance; the connotations seem to encourage dissent within the ranks.

That is all.

General Amnistar

Adminned at 11 Feb 2009 18:24:10 UTC

Add the following Rule, ‘Frags’:

Each Soldier has an attribute called ‘Frags’, which is tracked in the GNDT and starts at 0.

When a Skirmish ends, the Frags of participating Soldiers shall increase by the number of Enemy Combatants involved who became Dead during the Skirmish.

Comments

Klisz:

12-02-2009 00:53:29 UTC

imperial

Amnistar: he/him

12-02-2009 00:56:51 UTC

for

Hix:

12-02-2009 01:04:07 UTC

against

Klisz:

12-02-2009 01:10:57 UTC

Hix, why do you vote against everything?

Rodlen:

12-02-2009 01:21:53 UTC

against

Thematically incorrect.  Fragging in the military was for friendly fragmentation grenading.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frag_(military)

Sparrow:

12-02-2009 01:22:51 UTC

I don’t care if the name is changed.

Rodlen:

12-02-2009 01:28:09 UTC

...Dammit, that was supposed to be a link to Frag (military)

Qwazukee:

12-02-2009 01:28:18 UTC

for

Sparrow:

12-02-2009 01:32:30 UTC

@Rodlen: Do you have a suggestion for a different name?

Rodlen:

12-02-2009 01:51:18 UTC

Just plain old Kills would be fine.

Fragging would be a fun rule to add thematically correctly, though.

Sparrow:

12-02-2009 01:52:57 UTC

I think Amnistar said he would Veto w/ prejudice anything that allowed Friendly Fire.

Amnistar: he/him

12-02-2009 01:56:32 UTC

against For theme reasons, better for Kill Count, or something else.

Sparrow:

12-02-2009 02:09:58 UTC

against s/k

Will re-propose as ‘Kills’

Clucky: he/him

12-02-2009 02:22:29 UTC

for Who cares Hix? ‘Frag’ is understood to be your kills in gaming circles.

Amnistar: he/him

12-02-2009 02:22:38 UTC

also, I will veto anything that allows for INTENTIONAL friendly fire.  Grenade friendly fire?  That could be workd around.

Amnistar: he/him

12-02-2009 02:22:59 UTC

also…
veto
BOOOOOM